<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: First Week, Review of Pimsleur Greek and First Impressions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Feb 2012 06:44:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lyzazel - Linas</title>
		<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-867</link>
		<dc:creator>lyzazel - Linas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 10:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/?p=450#comment-867</guid>
		<description>Lol, strange, isn&#039;t it? The thing is, it doesn&#039;t sound much like Spanish to me anymore once I learned some. I guess if spoken real fast it still would, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, strange, isn&#8217;t it? The thing is, it doesn&#8217;t sound much like Spanish to me anymore once I learned some. I guess if spoken real fast it still would, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyzazel - Linas</title>
		<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-868</link>
		<dc:creator>lyzazel - Linas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jun 2011 10:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/?p=450#comment-868</guid>
		<description>Lol, strange, isn&#039;t it? The thing is, it doesn&#039;t sound much like Spanish to me anymore once I learned some. I guess if spoken real fast it still would, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lol, strange, isn&#8217;t it? The thing is, it doesn&#8217;t sound much like Spanish to me anymore once I learned some. I guess if spoken real fast it still would, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen</title>
		<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-861</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jun 2011 03:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/?p=450#comment-861</guid>
		<description>I totally agree that it sounds like Spanish. It&#039;s funny that you say that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree that it sounds like Spanish. It&#8217;s funny that you say that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mariannaki_285</title>
		<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-808</link>
		<dc:creator>Mariannaki_285</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/?p=450#comment-808</guid>
		<description>hahhaha..&lt;&lt;I&gt;&gt; i am  greek.. what you said is half true.. we like combining words .. or we like using words that have a stupid meaning and funny sound.. for example : κουφάλα=koufala=cavity when someone s sneaky we say είσαι μεγάλη κουφάλα ρε = you are a big cavity (re) but i call my friends like that all the time XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahhaha..&lt;<i>&gt; i am  greek.. what you said is half true.. we like combining words .. or we like using words that have a stupid meaning and funny sound.. for example : κουφάλα=koufala=cavity when someone s sneaky we say είσαι μεγάλη κουφάλα ρε = you are a big cavity (re) but i call my friends like that all the time XD</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johano</title>
		<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-449</link>
		<dc:creator>Johano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:56:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/?p=450#comment-449</guid>
		<description>Actually, the feminine article is &lt;b&gt;η&lt;/b&gt;, though it&#039;s pronounced like &lt;b&gt;ι&lt;/b&gt; in Modern Greek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the feminine article is <b>η</b>, though it&#8217;s pronounced like <b>ι</b> in Modern Greek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johano</title>
		<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-775</link>
		<dc:creator>Johano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/?p=450#comment-775</guid>
		<description>Actually, the feminine article is &lt;b&gt;η&lt;/b&gt;, though it&#039;s pronounced like &lt;b&gt;ι&lt;/b&gt; in Modern Greek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the feminine article is <b>η</b>, though it&#8217;s pronounced like <b>ι</b> in Modern Greek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haddock</title>
		<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-322</link>
		<dc:creator>Haddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:48:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/?p=450#comment-322</guid>
		<description>I agree about MT and Pimsleur.
I went through the Arabic  &quot;MT&quot; (not done by MT himself but more or less with hos principle). Well , although this was Egyptian dialect, this considerably  reinforced  my 2 Pismeur Syrian Arabic levels, I understood things I had not inferred. 
This may be more true for &quot;difficult&quot; languages. Pimsleur Spanish and Italian or Portuguese were easy and I upraded to Assimil, I am not csure MT would have added much. But MT first may be another good option instead of Pimsleur First, I won&#039;t have any opportunity to try it, I guess. 
I&#039;m not certain, but getting as good a pronunciation as possible early my be paramount. MT (english speaker ones) are not good at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about MT and Pimsleur.<br />
I went through the Arabic  &#8220;MT&#8221; (not done by MT himself but more or less with hos principle). Well , although this was Egyptian dialect, this considerably  reinforced  my 2 Pismeur Syrian Arabic levels, I understood things I had not inferred.<br />
This may be more true for &#8220;difficult&#8221; languages. Pimsleur Spanish and Italian or Portuguese were easy and I upraded to Assimil, I am not csure MT would have added much. But MT first may be another good option instead of Pimsleur First, I won&#8217;t have any opportunity to try it, I guess.<br />
I&#8217;m not certain, but getting as good a pronunciation as possible early my be paramount. MT (english speaker ones) are not good at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haddock</title>
		<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-774</link>
		<dc:creator>Haddock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 14:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/?p=450#comment-774</guid>
		<description>I agree about MT and Pimsleur.
I went through the Arabic  &quot;MT&quot; (not done by MT himself but more or less with hos principle). Well , although this was Egyptian dialect, this considerably  reinforced  my 2 Pismeur Syrian Arabic levels, I understood things I had not inferred. 
This may be more true for &quot;difficult&quot; languages. Pimsleur Spanish and Italian or Portuguese were easy and I upraded to Assimil, I am not csure MT would have added much. But MT first may be another good option instead of Pimsleur First, I won&#039;t have any opportunity to try it, I guess. 
I&#039;m not certain, but getting as good a pronunciation as possible early my be paramount. MT (english speaker ones) are not good at that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree about MT and Pimsleur.<br />
I went through the Arabic  &#8220;MT&#8221; (not done by MT himself but more or less with hos principle). Well , although this was Egyptian dialect, this considerably  reinforced  my 2 Pismeur Syrian Arabic levels, I understood things I had not inferred.<br />
This may be more true for &#8220;difficult&#8221; languages. Pimsleur Spanish and Italian or Portuguese were easy and I upraded to Assimil, I am not csure MT would have added much. But MT first may be another good option instead of Pimsleur First, I won&#8217;t have any opportunity to try it, I guess.<br />
I&#8217;m not certain, but getting as good a pronunciation as possible early my be paramount. MT (english speaker ones) are not good at that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyzazel</title>
		<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-321</link>
		<dc:creator>lyzazel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/?p=450#comment-321</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t want it to seem like I had taken offense. There was no reason to, you seem to have informative and well reasoned comments.

As for differences between Pimsleur and Michel Thomas, that deserves a paper or at least a post in itself but basically I believe that Michel Thomas teaches the essential grammar while Pimsleur focuses on vocabulary. After Michel Thomas, you would be able to pick up a dictionary and construct your sentences with it because you would know how to do grammar (although surely in a somewhat limited way but that&#039;s normal). I think that a true language course should have that. With Pimsleur, you wouldn&#039;t really know how to do this because you have learned the most common verbs and their conjugations but not how to actually conjugate verbs in general. At least that&#039;s the general impression I have been getting. It should also be taken into account that Michel Thomas Foundation + Advanced is about 15 hours which is only one third of the 45 hours that all three levels of Pimsleur take. The non-native pronunciation thing is not a thing that is intrinsic in the Michel Thomas method and I can be easily fixed just like you said.

And you&#039;re right, there are a lot of opinions about those. Often both of these courses seem to be like a &quot;love or hate&quot; type of thing to people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t want it to seem like I had taken offense. There was no reason to, you seem to have informative and well reasoned comments.</p>
<p>As for differences between Pimsleur and Michel Thomas, that deserves a paper or at least a post in itself but basically I believe that Michel Thomas teaches the essential grammar while Pimsleur focuses on vocabulary. After Michel Thomas, you would be able to pick up a dictionary and construct your sentences with it because you would know how to do grammar (although surely in a somewhat limited way but that&#8217;s normal). I think that a true language course should have that. With Pimsleur, you wouldn&#8217;t really know how to do this because you have learned the most common verbs and their conjugations but not how to actually conjugate verbs in general. At least that&#8217;s the general impression I have been getting. It should also be taken into account that Michel Thomas Foundation + Advanced is about 15 hours which is only one third of the 45 hours that all three levels of Pimsleur take. The non-native pronunciation thing is not a thing that is intrinsic in the Michel Thomas method and I can be easily fixed just like you said.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re right, there are a lot of opinions about those. Often both of these courses seem to be like a &#8220;love or hate&#8221; type of thing to people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lyzazel</title>
		<link>http://ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/first-week-review-of-pimsleur-greek-and-first-impressions/comment-page-1/#comment-773</link>
		<dc:creator>lyzazel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 11:32:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ikindalikelanguages.com/blog/?p=450#comment-773</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t want it to seem like I had taken offense. There was no reason to, you seem to have informative and well reasoned comments.

As for differences between Pimsleur and Michel Thomas, that deserves a paper or at least a post in itself but basically I believe that Michel Thomas teaches the essential grammar while Pimsleur focuses on vocabulary. After Michel Thomas, you would be able to pick up a dictionary and construct your sentences with it because you would know how to do grammar (although surely in a somewhat limited way but that&#039;s normal). I think that a true language course should have that. With Pimsleur, you wouldn&#039;t really know how to do this because you have learned the most common verbs and their conjugations but not how to actually conjugate verbs in general. At least that&#039;s the general impression I have been getting. It should also be taken into account that Michel Thomas Foundation + Advanced is about 15 hours which is only one third of the 45 hours that all three levels of Pimsleur take. The non-native pronunciation thing is not a thing that is intrinsic in the Michel Thomas method and I can be easily fixed just like you said.

And you&#039;re right, there are a lot of opinions about those. Often both of these courses seem to be like a &quot;love or hate&quot; type of thing to people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t want it to seem like I had taken offense. There was no reason to, you seem to have informative and well reasoned comments.</p>
<p>As for differences between Pimsleur and Michel Thomas, that deserves a paper or at least a post in itself but basically I believe that Michel Thomas teaches the essential grammar while Pimsleur focuses on vocabulary. After Michel Thomas, you would be able to pick up a dictionary and construct your sentences with it because you would know how to do grammar (although surely in a somewhat limited way but that&#8217;s normal). I think that a true language course should have that. With Pimsleur, you wouldn&#8217;t really know how to do this because you have learned the most common verbs and their conjugations but not how to actually conjugate verbs in general. At least that&#8217;s the general impression I have been getting. It should also be taken into account that Michel Thomas Foundation + Advanced is about 15 hours which is only one third of the 45 hours that all three levels of Pimsleur take. The non-native pronunciation thing is not a thing that is intrinsic in the Michel Thomas method and I can be easily fixed just like you said.</p>
<p>And you&#8217;re right, there are a lot of opinions about those. Often both of these courses seem to be like a &#8220;love or hate&#8221; type of thing to people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

