{"id":256,"date":"2010-02-05T16:08:44","date_gmt":"2010-02-05T14:08:44","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/?p=256"},"modified":"2016-01-26T01:44:26","modified_gmt":"2016-01-25T23:44:26","slug":"it-is-far-easier-just-to-learn-the-basics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/it-is-far-easier-just-to-learn-the-basics\/","title":{"rendered":"It Is Far Easier Just To Learn The Basics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In this post I am going to <strong>prove<\/strong> to you that <strong>it is a better to learn a bit of many different languages than to learn one or a few languages until fluency<\/strong> if you care about understanding what words are being said in the world in general.  There is a lot of statistics written about it but it&#8217;s just common sense. Let me illustrate it for you in a way to that you can make sure of it by yourself.<\/p>\n<p>Imagine a universe where all communication is done by using <strong>8 simple words<\/strong>. Let&#8217;s say they are:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>run<\/li>\n<li>fight<\/li>\n<li>eat<\/li>\n<li>sex<\/li>\n<li>pee<\/li>\n<li>sleep<\/li>\n<li>hide<\/li>\n<li>wash<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Well, that seems like something that most life forms on Earth do most of the time anyway.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s just suppose that whenever one individual wants to do one of those things he just conveys this information by saying this word. Saying it could get you something (for example, food) and even if you don&#8217;t need something to do it, it is necessary to get the approval of the community to do all of these things thus you need to say it anyhow.<\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s then look into an average individual. We would give him a name but that would mean having an extra word so we can&#8217;t. Unless we were to name him something like <em>pee<\/em> but that would add some confusion to the language. A day wouldn&#8217;t be a good time scale so we will be using a week. Let&#8217;s just say that he does these things:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>he has to <strong>run<\/strong> somewhere once a day and that is <strong>7 times a week<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>he has to <strong>fight<\/strong> someone about <strong>1 time per week<\/strong> (pretty peaceful isn&#8217;t it?)<\/li>\n<li>he does <strong>eat<\/strong> three times a day that would be three times seven or <strong>21 times a week<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>he has <strong>sex<\/strong> say <strong>2 <\/strong><strong>times a week<\/strong> (nature still has to somehow trick those individuals into reproduction but doing it too often would leave less time for finding food or running from predators)<\/li>\n<li>he does <strong>pee<\/strong> two times a day and that is two times seven or<strong> 14 times per week<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>he does <strong>sleep<\/strong> once a day so that is <strong>7 times per week<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>he has to <strong>hide<\/strong> from predators <strong>3<\/strong><strong> times a week<\/strong><\/li>\n<li>he has to <strong>wash<\/strong> himself almost every day but not quite so it comes out as <strong>5 times per week<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Let&#8217;s now add all of those together. Let&#8217;s see how many things he does and thus <strong>how many words he says per week<\/strong>. I&#8217;ll be completely transparent about my math: <strong>7 + 1 + 21 + 2 + 14 + 7 + 3 + 5 = 60<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Let&#8217;s now arrange our things in the order of frequency and count what percent of the whole words said every week they make:<\/p>\n<ol>\n<li>eat: 21 (21\/60 * 100% = <strong>35%<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<li>pee: 14 (14\/60 * 100% \u2248 <strong>23.3%<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<li>sleep: 7 (7\/60 * 100%  \u2248 <strong>11.7%<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<li>run: 7 (7\/60 * 100%  \u2248 <strong>11.7%<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<li>wash 5 (5\/60 * 100% \u2248 <strong>8.3%<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<li>hide 3 (3\/60 * 100% = <strong>5%<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<li>sex 2 (2\/60 * 100% \u2248 <strong>3.3%<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<li>fight 1 (1\/60 * 100% \u2248 <strong>1.7%<\/strong>)<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<p>If that&#8217;s true then we say the word <strong>eat<\/strong> 35% of the time while we say the word fight only approximately 1.7% of the time. Thus out of every hundred words any average individual says, <strong>thirty-five<\/strong> of them are <strong>eat<\/strong> and roughly <strong>two<\/strong> are <strong>fight<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Now imagine we would like to learn this language by learning one word at a time. Also imagine that you are lucky enough to have this data and you are smart enough to look at this data before learning the words so you learn them in order from the most used to the least used. Here I have graphed how much of the total vocabulary you know after having learned each individual word.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/percentageofvocabularylearned.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-257\" title=\"percentageofvocabularylearned\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/percentageofvocabularylearned.png\" alt=\"The percentages of acquired vocabulary: used versus total vocabulary\" width=\"630\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/percentageofvocabularylearned.png 630w, https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/percentageofvocabularylearned-300x238.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 630px) 100vw, 630px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Look at it. The red line shows how much of the vocabulary you have learnt by its frequency and the blue line shows the number of the vocabulary learned by its count. The green bar shows the difference.<\/p>\n<p>If you know the words eat and pee you know over <strong>58.3% <\/strong>that is <strong>over a half<\/strong> of the total vocabulary used in the language (while you only know 2\/8 * 100% = <strong>25% <\/strong>that is only <strong>one fourth<\/strong> of the total vocabulary)!  The more words a language has, the slower the green line grows while that is not necessarily true for the red line.<\/p>\n<p>Another interesting thing is that this graph <strong>refutes the 80\/20 rule<\/strong>. Do you know the rule that suggests that you are reaping <strong>80%<\/strong> of the benefits from only <strong>20%<\/strong> of the work. Well, it is not quite true in this graph: here it should be the <strong>80\/50 rule <\/strong>instead. However, it is true that you achieve the highest efficiency at around 20 percent (25% actually) so perhaps the rule does do some good.<\/p>\n<p>Here is another chart with the difference between the two percentages:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/differencebetweentwovocabularies.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-258\" title=\"differencebetweentwovocabularies\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/differencebetweentwovocabularies.png\" alt=\"The difference between the percentages of acquired vocabulary: used versus total vocabulary\" width=\"699\" height=\"500\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/differencebetweentwovocabularies.png 699w, https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/differencebetweentwovocabularies-300x214.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 699px) 100vw, 699px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>Here you can see the same thing but more clearly: the graph goes up in the beginning, then peaks at the second word and then goes down fast. It is conceivable that most human languages do not peak as early because there are a lot of words in these languages and the differences in the frequency of their usage is not as drastic as shown here. Here is the last graph to illustrate the changing returns directly to you:<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/changingreturnsbyeachword.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-full wp-image-259\" title=\"changingreturnsbyeachword\" src=\"http:\/\/www.ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/changingreturnsbyeachword.png\" alt=\"Your returns of learning each extra word\" width=\"700\" height=\"441\" srcset=\"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/changingreturnsbyeachword.png 700w, https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/changingreturnsbyeachword-300x189.png 300w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 700px) 100vw, 700px\" \/><\/a><\/p>\n<p>You can again seen how you get a big edge by learning the first word because it is used <strong>35%<\/strong> of the time yet it constitutes only <strong>12.5%<\/strong> of the vocabulary (<strong>35%<\/strong> &#8211; <strong>12.5%<\/strong> = <strong>22.5%<\/strong>) and you still keep that positive with the second word because it is used <strong>23.3% <\/strong>of the time and still counts for another <strong>12.5%<\/strong> of the time (<strong>23.3% &#8211; 12.5% = <\/strong><strong>10.8%<\/strong>), yet you suddenly get negative returns from the third word because it is used <strong>11.7%<\/strong> of the time and still takes up <strong>12.5%<\/strong> of the vocabulary. Thus you ccan increase your edge (although not as drastically) with the second word and then you begin decreasing it with the third word. Ideally if you were very worried about efficiency you would only be learning the first two words of this imaginary language.<\/p>\n<p>This all means that it only takes you to learn <strong>12.5<\/strong><strong>%<\/strong> of the vocabulary to move  from understanding nothing to understanding the first <strong>38.5%<\/strong> (that is roughly <strong>40%<\/strong>) of the spoken language while it takes you to learn another <strong>37.5% <\/strong>of the vocabulary to understand <strong>81.7% <\/strong>(that is roughly <strong>80%<\/strong>) of the spoken language and then it takes you to learn the remaining <strong>50% <\/strong>of the vocabulary to understand the last <strong>18.7% <\/strong>(roughly <strong>20%<\/strong>) of the spoken language.<\/p>\n<p>What is the <strong>conclusion<\/strong>? The conclusion is that <strong>it takes you a lot less effort to learn to understand some certain percent of any language you are learning and it gets harder and harder after that<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Thus, take this hypothetical situation that there are four different tribes living in the world with 4 different languages spoken and completely different words for each of these 8 things. Suppose that you have time to learn 8 words in total. Let&#8217;s compare two strategies you could take here. You could choose to learn all 8 words of the same language. If you do that, you would be able to understand 100% \/ 4 = <strong>25% <\/strong>of the words said in the world (assuming that all four tribes are of the same size and speak with the same frequency&#8230;). Another strategy you could take would be to learn two words of each language. If you chose this strategy you would then be able to understand <strong>58% * 4 \/ 4 = 58% <\/strong>of the worlds said in the world. In the first case, you would be able to understand only one fourth of what the whole population of the world says and in the second case you would get more than a half.<\/p>\n<p>Of course, is is true that this only counts if you care about understanding in general. If you live in one of those communities and you have to be able to communicate to get approval to do each of those things then your best bet is to learn all of the words of this community because otherwise you will not be able to, for example, get approval to <strong>sleep<\/strong> or whatnot. However, if you do not happen to live there and you just want to get to know them all a bit then the second strategy is clearly superior.<\/p>\n<p>Thus if you are interested in understanding what the world is talking about in general <strong>it is a better strategy to learn a bit of a lot of different languages than to learn one or a few languages to fluency<\/strong>.<\/p>\n<p>Finally, let&#8217;s answer one last question: does this apply to real languages spoken in the world as oppose to imaginary languages in imaginary universes? Well, the whole hypothesis is based on the notion that different words are not spoken with the same frequency. If this presupposition is true then following logics <strong>the conclusion must be true<\/strong> at least to some extent (the extent of this being true depending on word frequency)<strong>. <span style=\"font-weight: normal;\">Now if you believe that the word <\/span>have<\/strong> and the word <strong>syzygy <\/strong>are used with a different frequency then you believe that our presupposition is true and that this conclusion also holds for the languages of the world! I rest my case.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In this post I am going to <strong>prove<\/strong> to you that <strong>it is a better to learn a bit of many different languages than to learn one or a few languages until fluency<\/strong> if you care about understanding what people are speaking about in the world in general.  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[31],"tags":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=256"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1012,"href":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/256\/revisions\/1012"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=256"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=256"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ikindalikelanguages.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=256"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}